Engineering Review Process. The Editor-in-Chief selects peer referees upon the recommendation of the Editorial Board members or from the specialist database owned by the Editorial Board. The peer-reviewers will be blinded with respect to the name s and affiliation s of the author s. Typically, the original article of manuscript is handled by an Associate Editor who selects two investigators in the same field or most closely related field as referees according to recommendation of the Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board.
If decided necessary, review for statistics may be additionally requested. Acceptance of the manuscript is decided, based on the critiques and recommended decision of the referees. A referee's decision is made in four categories as "acceptance without revision", "acceptance after minor revision", "review again after revision", and rejection". The reviewed manuscript are returned back to the corresponding author with comments and recommended revisions.
Name and individual decisions of the referees are not transmitted to the author if requested. For papers 'accepted without revision', they are received and published as they are received. For papers 'accepted after minor revision', papers are returned to corresponding authors for minor revision.
And resubmitted papers are published without another full process of peer-review but subjected to acceptable explanations for the points raised by referees.
However, Editor-in-Chief may request additional review or comments on the revised paper by members of editorial board if it seems necessary. For papers 're-review after major revision', these papers are returned to corresponding authors for full revision.
And resubmitted papers are subjected to another complete review process and acceptable explanation for the points raised by referees. For the 'rejected' papers, a letter of rejection is sent to the corresponding under by the name of Editor-in-Chief with reasons for rejection. Comments from referees are not included.
The usual reasons of rejection are insufficient originality, serious scientific flaws, poor quality of illustrations, improper manuscript format or absence of massage that might be important to the intended readers.
Though the peer review process may in general take three weeks after submission of the manuscript, longer review period may be needed to finalize the review process. Revisions are usually requested to take account of criticism and comments made by referees. Revised manuscripts should be re-submitted, including one set of original illustrations.
Failure to resubmit the revised manuscripts within eight weeks is regarded as withdrawal from the publication by author s. Corresponding author must indicate clearly what alterations have been made in response to the referees comments, point by point.
Acceptable reasons should be given for noncompliance with any recommendation of the referees. Once fully accepted, original articles will be published without page charges within three months. Your Shopping Cart. Subtotal: 0.However, till date, I have not received a decision. I have written an email to editor, who replied that the paper is waiting for the editor's decision.
Is it a bad sign? Does this mean the article will be rejected? Asked on 07 Oct, It's been slightly over a month since the status changed to "Reviews completed. This can happen if there are a lot of manuscript queued up before yours. Your manuscript is waiting for it's turn for the editor to take a look at it and arrive at a decision based on the reviews. Don't worry, this is just standard procedure. It does not indicate either a rejection or an acceptance.
You will have to wait for the decision letter to know the fate of your paper. However, the fact that the editor has replied to your email is a sign that the journal is actively processing your paper. Keep your fingers crossed!Man who fell to his death from building
All the best! What can I do if the status "Awaiting AE decision" has lasted for nearly four months? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Oct, Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Recommended Courses. Manuscript Status. Q: My paper's status shows "Reviews completed," but I've not received a decision.
Does this indicate rejection?I'm a grad student wanting to apply motivated reasoning to the decision about my submission. The paper has said "reviews completed" for about a week.
Does this at least suggest the editor is considering it? I would think negative reviews would make the job of editor easy in rejecting It likely means the editor is busy with some other aspect of your life and hasn't looked at the reviews. It's not negative A week is not a "long time. Agree with both "1 week is not a long time" and "it means nothing.
Time better spent working on another manuscript. Review completed means the journal has received the minimum number of required reviews. This means the editor has yet to copy and paste the standard rejection template into an e-mail. He is possibly busy at work, on vacation or digging a hole in a park somewhere, waiting for his pointless life to end. It is easy to know if your paper will be rejected or not, because of what you did in the first round. You know for sure if you satisfied the reviewers or not.
I have the same status for my paper now: Required Reviews Completed I am sure my paper will be accepted because I did good job.The village of carvisi
I will let you know once I get the answer. Long time with "Reviews Completed" a good sign? How does "motivated reasoning" differ from wishful thinking?Castagnoli riccardo
If you have the same status in two months then you know this is the case. Sorry to hear it. I got the reject now lol. Hope those keep coming for you, lol. A year ago.Our paper, submitted in April to a Springer journal, was under review till September Even though it is past three weeks, there is no reply.
Asked on 12 Oct, Your question is not very clear. I am assuming that you wrote to the editor after the status changed to "Reviews completed. Sometimes, the status descriptions may not be very clear. Since the editor has said that the paper is under editorial decision, you should wait for a couple of weeks more.
If there is no change in status or if you don't receive a decision letter by then, you can write to the editor again asking for a status update. Why is my manuscript's status not changing from "Required reviews completed"? Answered by Editage Insights on 17 Oct, Answered by Djalal Sekhane on 26 Oct, Answered by Ta Fa on 30 Mar, Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
Recommended Courses. Manuscript Status. Q: The status shows "Reviews completed" but the editor is not replying. What should I do? Answer Follow this Question. Write an answer About text formats.
Answer: Your question is not very clear. Related reading: Why is my manuscript's status not changing from "Required reviews completed"? Upvote this Answer Comment.
Answer: hi i already passed by this situation few days ago i submit my paper since january, no repley was send. Upvote this Answer 1 Comment. Answer: I have the same problem. I sent a manuscript to the new generation computing Springer.
Official speed metric: Number of days from submission of the manuscript to first decision is 16 days. However, I have been waiting for the first decision for a long time days. I sent my manuscript to this journal because of Official speed metric, but they have been writing lies. Upvote this Answer 4 Comment. Answer this question.
Ask a new question. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. No Yes. Show comments. Follow this Question.Economist 55cd. I waited more than three months after seeing the Required Reviews Competed status. The paper got accepted and no report was even forwarded to me. Economist e. Pretty much all of the scenarios mentioned above are possible. However, it is advisable to wait a few months before bugging the editor even after the status change, unless it is really crucial, like you are up for tenure and the committee is about to decide and this paper will make the difference.Jagex unauthorized charges
Economist 3f Economist d. Economist ea3d. Economist a. Economist a7cf. The completed reviews were only stating that your paper is close to being unreadable, given your language skills. Economist a Economist 38a5. The question should be "how long take to make a dicision after the status "under reviews" for the second TWICE".
Economist f06d. Economist a05c. Economist d92a. What this probably means is that initially the editor sent it to a couple of people. When the editor removed them from the list, the system automatically posted "required reviews done" because all outstanding reviewers had responded.
When the editor finally found a new referee, it went "back under review. A lot of referee reports get written over the break.
People use them as a great excuse to go hide when visiting the in-laws true fact! Editors all know this and don't start pulling plugs on things until January. Economist 13e2. Required reviews completed, should I send an email to the editor? Is awaiting decision by the editor the same as required reviews are submitted? Never check the status of your paper. You don't have any bearing on the process anyway. I repeat, stop making dicisions.
The question should be "how long take to make a dicision after the status "under reviews" for the second TWICE" thank you very much Economist8a58 for the correction. The dicision guy is back. For the third twice I advice to stop making dicisions.Corresponding Authors are encouraged to access the status of their manuscripts at any time by logging into Editorial Manager as an Author and locating the submission in one of the queues on the Author Main Menu.
Submissions that have not yet received a final decision will be accessible in different queues on the Main Menu screen depending on the manuscript status.Bash round to 2 decimal places
Submissions that have received a decision will be accessible in the Submissions with a Decision queue. Below is a list of what the different status descriptions indicate both before and after acceptance. Manuscript Submitted Submission has been approved by the author and is awaiting a formatting check by AMS staff. With Editor An editor has been assigned to the manuscript.
Under Review The assigned editor has initiated the Peer Review process. Required Reviews Completed All necessary reviews have been received by the editorial office the editor may seek additional reviews in some cases.
Decision in Process The editor has begun to enter the decision into the system, but the author has not yet been notified. Revised Manuscript Submitted Revision has been approved by the author and is awaiting a formatting check by AMS staff. Completed Reject A final decision of rejection has been made by the editor. Completed Withdrawn A final decision of withdrawal has been made by the author or the editor.
Completed Accept A final decision of acceptance has been made by the editor.
In PPQ Manuscript is undergoing a readiness check by staff ensuring all required submission files are present, the page charge forms have been submitted, etc.
Once the task is assigned to our vendor this status disappears and the corresponding author is sent a notification email that the manuscript has been sent for EOR posting. The manuscript cannot proceed through production until the missing elements have been resolved. Ready for Tooling The readiness check is complete and the source files are ready to be transferred to our commercial press for tooling pre-edit processing. At DJS for Tooling Tooling task in progress at press element tagging, rote copy edit tasks, figure processing, etc.
Manuscript Ready for Copy Edit Pre-edit tooling complete; manuscript now in queue for copy editing. Manuscript Assigned to Copy Editor Copy edit in progress. Manuscript Ready for Technical Edit Copy edit complete; manuscript now in queue for technical editing.
Manuscript Assigned to Technical Editor Technical edit in progress. First Proof Ready for Copy Editing Author has returned corrected proof; proof is in queue for copy editing. First Proof Ready for Technical Editor Copy edit of proof complete; proof is in queue for technical editor. Ready for Issue Assignment The article has completed the editing process and can be sent for publication unless there are holds due to missing copyright forms, missing payment, etc. Publication Complete The article is now available online.Please log in to track the publication status of your book or article and enjoy your free eBook.
For authors: Request password. This persistent ID distinguishes you from every other researcher.
Automated linkages between you and your publications or reviews ensure that your work is recognized. Here are a few options to find a suitable journalsuch as an alphabetical list and the Journal Suggester. For the majority of Springer journals, publishing an article is free of charge.How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less
Yes, Springer offers Open Choice open access articles published in subscription-based journals and fully open access journals. Read more about our open access portfolio here.
Please go to the homepage of the selected journal and click "Instructions for Authors". Does Springer provide templates and style files for preparing a journal article?
For your convenience we have developed macros and templates to help you prepare your manuscript. For editors and reviewers to accurately assess the work presented in your manuscript you need to ensure the English language is of sufficient quality to be understood.
If you need help with writing in English you should consider:. If your manuscript is accepted it will be checked by our copy editors for spelling and formal style before publication.
Frequently asked questions
Illustrations — photographs, line drawings, etc — should be submitted in digital form. For detailed information about about file formats, resolution, figure sizing, etc, please check our artwork guidelines. Can I submit multimedia files to be published online along with my article? Springer accepts electronic supplementary material animations, movies, audio, large original data, etc. This feature can add dimension to the article, as certain information cannot be printed or is more convenient in electronic form.
For detailed information about file formats, file size, etc, please check our ESM guidelines. We are committed to your publishing success. It may be more suitable for another journal! While the manuscript files are handed over to production for data processing and typesetting, you being the corresponding author will stay in touch with us through MyPublication. There you will be asked whether you wish to:. Authors will be asked to agree to the publication terms of their article to the publisher or grant the publisher exclusive publication and dissemination rights.
This will ensure the widest possible protection and dissemination of information under copyright laws. Open access articles Open Choice articles or fully open access journals do not require you to transfer the copyright; the copyright remains with the authors.Fake virus file
Articles published before that date are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License. What exactly is the "MyPublication" service and how can I benefit from it?
- Eco atm code
- Tl082 vs lm358
- Japanese text symbols
- Java conversion program
- Engilesh sexy jabardsti selpeeng dosto ka behenko
- Omnium cargo bike price
- Jaw stretcher
- Correspondent banking aml
- E-commerce: #comprasicuro, parte la campagna per la sicurezza
- Maha meru
- Dyersburg warrant
- Net ads dns register
- Fgo cm
- Bdl laboratory
- Shoppy food
- Gsmarena dataset
- Leaf meaning in tamil
- Cartier donation request
- Omkar image download
- Gnu arm eclipse plugin github
- Make jumbled words